IFRS 2 Equity Settled Share-based Payments with Examples

Equity settled share-based payments account for the payment for goods/services in the form of equity instruments (shares or share options) of the company or group company.

Last Updated – September, 2026

Equity Settled Share-based Payments
IFRS 2 · IAS Accounting Standard

Equity Settled
Share-based Payments

Standard: IFRS 2 Body: IASB Category: Financial Reporting Read: ~12 min
2004IFRS 2 Issued
3Transaction Types
FVGrant-date Measure
E&PEquity & P&L Impact

01 · OVERVIEWWhat Are Equity Settled Share-based Payments?

Equity Settled Share-based Payment is a transaction in which an entity receives goods or services as consideration for its own equity instruments (including shares, share options, or other equity instruments). The entity settles its obligation by issuing equity rather than paying cash.

These arrangements are present in modern corporate compensation, from startup stock option plans to FTSE 100 long-term incentive programmes (LTIPs). Understanding their accounting treatment under IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment ( IASB official standard ) is essential for accountants, CFOs, auditors, and investors alike.

Grant Date

The date on which the entity and counterparty agree to the arrangement and fair value is measured.

Equity Instruments

Shares, share options, or instruments that give the holder a residual interest in the entity.

Fair Value

Measured at grant date; not remeasured subsequently, the key difference from cash settled share-based payments.

Vesting Period

The period over which all specified vesting conditions must be satisfied by the counterparty.

02 · SCOPEWhen Does IFRS 2 Apply?

IFRS 2 applies to all share-based payment transactions, whether with employees or other parties supplying goods or services. It covers three broad categories of arrangements:

✓ In Scope
  • Employee share option schemes
  • Restricted stock unit (RSU) plans
  • Long-term incentive plans (LTIPs)
  • Save-As-You-Earn (SAYE) schemes
  • Share purchase plans
  • Goods/services settled by issuing equity
  • Group share-based arrangements
✗ Out of Scope
  • Business combinations (IFRS 3)
  • Equity instruments issued for financial instruments (IAS 32 / IFRS 9)
  • Routine share issuances to raise capital
  • Contract modifications outside the standard
  • Transactions with owners acting as owners

03 · RECOGNITIONRecognition Principles

Under IFRS 2, when an entity grants equity instruments to employees, it recognises a corresponding increase in equity. The expense is spread over the vesting period as the employee renders service, reflecting the economic substance of the arrangement.

The Core Accounting Entry

Debit: Employee Benefit Expense (P&L) or the relevant cost (e.g., inventory, fixed asset)
Credit: Equity Reserve (Share-based Payment Reserve in equity)

The expense is recognised over the vesting period as the services are received from the employee.

Transactions with Employees vs Non-employees

For employee transactions, the fair value of services cannot be reliably estimated directly, so the fair value of the equity instruments granted is used as a proxy, measured at grant date and fixed thereafter.

For non-employee transactions, the fair value of goods or services received is measured directly, with the equity instruments’ fair value used only if the direct measure is unreliable.

Key principle: The total expense recognised over the full vesting period equals the fair value of equity instruments that ultimately vest, adjusted for any market conditions baked into the grant-date fair value.

04 · MEASUREMENTHow Are Equity Settled Share-based Payments Measured?

The fair value of equity instruments, particularly share options is determined at grant date using an appropriate option-pricing model. IFRS 2 does not prescribe a specific model but acknowledges the following approaches:

ModelBest Used ForKey Inputs
Black-Scholes-MertonEuropean-style options; simple plansSpot price, exercise price, volatility, risk-free rate, dividend yield, time to expiry
Binomial LatticeAmerican-style options; early exercise likelySame as BSM plus expected early exercise patterns
Monte Carlo SimulationMarket-based conditions (TSR, relative performance)Correlated share price paths, market conditions
Intrinsic ValuePermitted only if fair value cannot be estimated reliablySpot price minus exercise price (minimum floor)

Key Inputs & Considerations

Black-Scholes-Merton Option Value (simplified) C = S₀ · N(d₁) − X · e−rT · N(d₂) Where: S₀ = current share price | X = exercise price | r = risk-free rate | T = time to expiry | N(·) = cumulative normal distribution | d₁, d₂ = derived from volatility and time parameters
InputEstimation Guidance
Share PriceMarket price of shares at grant date
Exercise PriceSet in the option award terms
Expected VolatilityHistorical volatility of entity’s shares; implied volatility if observable
Expected LifeWeighted average period options are expected to be outstanding (typically shorter than contractual term)
Risk-Free RateYield on zero-coupon government bonds with term matching expected option life
Expected DividendsExcluded from fair value if option holder does not receive dividends during the vesting period

05 · VESTINGVesting Conditions Explained

Vesting conditions determine whether and when the counterparty becomes entitled to the equity instruments. IFRS 2 classifies conditions into two types, each attracting a fundamentally different accounting treatment:

Market Conditions
  • Linked to market price of entity’s shares (e.g., Total Shareholder Return vs. index)
  • Probability of achievement incorporated into grant-date fair value via Monte Carlo
  • Expense recognised regardless of whether condition is met
  • No true-up adjustment for market condition outcomes
Non-Market Conditions
  • Service conditions (e.g., continuing employment for 3 years)
  • Performance conditions (e.g., EPS growth, revenue targets)
  • NOT reflected in grant-date fair value
  • Expense based on best estimate of instruments expected to vest
  • True-up required at each reporting period end

The Vesting Timeline

Grant Date

Entity and counterparty agree to the arrangement. Fair value of equity instruments is determined. Vesting period commences.

During Vesting Period

Expense recognised on a straight-line basis (or accelerated for graded vesting). Estimate of instruments expected to vest updated at each period end.

Vesting Date

Cumulative expense equals: number of instruments actually vested × grant-date fair value. Equity reserve is not subsequently remeasured.

Exercise Date (Options)

Share-based payment reserve transferred to share capital and share premium. Cash received for exercise price (if any) also credited.

Lapse / Forfeiture

If options lapse unexercised post-vesting, the reserve may be transferred to retained earnings, no reversal of P&L expense is permitted.

06 · MODIFICATIONSModifications, Cancellations & Settlements of Equity Settled Share-based Payments

Entities sometimes modify the terms of share-based payment awards during the vesting period, for example, reducing the exercise price following a share price fall. IFRS 2 provides specific guidance on each scenario:

EventAccounting Treatment
Beneficial Modification (e.g., reduced exercise price)Recognise incremental fair value (modified FV minus original FV) over remaining vesting period, in addition to original grant-date FV
Non-beneficial ModificationIgnore the modification; continue accruing based on original grant-date FV as if no change occurred
Cancellation or Settlement (during vesting period)Accelerate recognition of remaining unvested expense immediately; any payment up to grant-date FV charged to equity; excess charged to P&L
Replacement Awards (e.g., in restructurings)Treated as a modification; incremental FV recognised over remaining vesting period
Post-vesting CancellationNo P&L effect; equity reserve may be transferred to retained earnings within equity

Cancellation rule: When an entity cancels an award during the vesting period, the unvested expense must be accelerated and recognised immediately. IFRS 2 treats cancellation as if vesting had occurred on the date of cancellation.

07 · JOURNAL ENTRIESJournal Entries & Examples of Equity Settled Share-based Payments

Example Setup

On 1 January 20X1, an entity grants 1,000 share options to an employee, with an exercise price of £5 per option. Grant-date fair value = £3 per option. Vesting condition: 3 years’ continuous service. All options vest and are exercised on 31 December 20X3.

Annual expense = (1,000 × £3) ÷ 3 years = £1,000 per year

Year 1 – 31 December 20X1: Recognise Annual Expense
Dr Employee Benefit Expense (P&L)£1,000
Cr Share-based Payment Reserve (Equity)£1,000
Years 2 & 3 – Repeat annually (same entry each year)
Dr Employee Benefit Expense (P&L)£1,000
Cr Share-based Payment Reserve (Equity)£1,000
31 December 20X3 – Exercise of Options (£5 exercise price × 1,000)
Dr Cash£5,000
Dr Share-based Payment Reserve (Equity)£3,000
Cr Share Capital + Share Premium£8,000

Note: If options lapse unexercised after vesting, the £3,000 reserve is simply reclassified within equity to retained earnings, no reversal of the P&L expense is permitted under IFRS 2.

Forfeiture Adjustment Example

If at Year 2 the entity revises its estimate downward expecting only 800 options to vest due to staff leavers, the cumulative expense is recalculated:

Cumulative Expense — Year 2 (Revised Estimate) Cumulative = (800 options × £3) × (2 yrs ÷ 3 yrs) = £1,600 Year 1 recognised: £1,000 → Year 2 charge = £1,600 − £1,000 = £600 (reduced expense reflecting revised forfeiture estimate)

08 · DISCLOSUREDisclosure Requirements

IFRS 2 requires extensive disclosures enabling users of financial statements to understand the nature, extent, and financial effects of share-based payment arrangements in existence during the reporting period.

Nature & Extent Disclosures

  1. Description of each type of share-based payment arrangement in existence during the period
  2. Number and weighted average exercise price of options outstanding at start and end of period, granted, forfeited, exercised, and expired
  3. Weighted average share price at date of exercise for options exercised during the period
  4. Range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding options

Fair Value Determination Disclosures

  1. Weighted average fair value of options granted and information on how fair value was measured
  2. Option pricing model used and its inputs (exercise price, share price, expected volatility, option life, dividends, risk-free rate)
  3. How expected volatility was determined and whether it is based on historical volatility
  4. Any other features of the option grant incorporated into fair value measurement (e.g., market conditions)

Effect on P&L and Balance Sheet

  1. Total expense recognised in the income statement from share-based payment transactions
  2. Total carrying amount in equity (share-based payment reserve) at period end
  3. Liabilities arising from cash-settled share-based arrangements (if any)

09 · FAQFrequently Asked Questions

What is the key difference between equity-settled and cash-settled share-based payments?
In equity-settled arrangements, the entity issues equity instruments and fair value is fixed at grant date, there is no subsequent remeasurement. In cash-settled arrangements (e.g., phantom shares, share appreciation rights), the entity pays cash equal to the value of shares, and a liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until settlement, with changes recognised in profit or loss.
Is the expense reversed if options are forfeited due to non-market performance conditions?
Yes, for non-market conditions (e.g., an EPS growth target not met), the cumulative expense is reversed because the vesting condition was not satisfied. However, for market conditions (e.g., TSR-linked awards), the expense is not reversed, the probability of achieving the market condition is already factored into the grant-date fair value via the Monte Carlo simulation.
Can a company use intrinsic value instead of fair value?
Only in rare cases where fair value cannot be reliably measured. IFRS 2 permits intrinsic value as a fallback, but crucially requires remeasurement at each reporting date and at settlement date, unlike the grant-date lock-in that applies to fair value measurement. This approach is an exception, not the norm, and requires clear justification.
How does graded vesting differ from cliff vesting for expense recognition?
With cliff vesting (all options vest simultaneously at period end), the expense is spread evenly over the single vesting period. With graded vesting (e.g., one-third per year over 3 years), each portion is treated as a separate award with its own vesting period. This results in front-loaded expense recognition, as earlier tranches carry shorter vesting periods and are charged more quickly.
What happens to the share-based payment reserve when options lapse after vesting?
When vested options lapse unexercised (e.g., the share price has fallen below the exercise price), the full expense has already been recognised in profit or loss during the vesting period. The reserve in equity may be reclassified to retained earnings, but no entry passes through P&L. IFRS 2 neither requires nor prohibits this reclassification, it is an accounting policy choice to be applied consistently.
How are group share-based payment arrangements accounted for?
In group schemes (e.g., a parent grants awards over its own shares to subsidiary employees), the subsidiary receiving the services recognises an expense and a corresponding equity contribution from the parent. IFRS 2 amendments (effective 2009) clarified that the receiving entity accounts for the transaction as equity-settled if the instruments granted are its own or its parent’s equity instruments.

Written by – Qualified Chartered Accountant & IFRS Specialist

This content is for educational purposes and does not constitute professional accounting or legal advice.

Standard referenced: IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment | Issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)