Cash Settled Share-based Payments | IFRS 2

Cash Settled Share-based Payments as per IFRS 2 INCLUDE the transactions in which the entity acquires goods or services by incurring liability to transfer cash or other assets to the supplier of those goods or services for amounts that are based on the price (or value) of Equity Instruments’ (including Shares or Share Options) of the entity.

What Are Cash Settled Share-based Payments?

A cash settled share-based payment is a transaction in which an entity receives goods or services from employees or other parties, and in return assumes a liability to transfer cash (or other assets) to those parties, where the amount of that liability is based on the price (or value) of the entity’s own equity instruments.

IFRS 2 Definition

Under IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, a cash settled share-based payment transaction is one where “the entity acquires goods or services by incurring a liability to transfer cash or other assets to the supplier of those goods or services for amounts that are based on the price (or value) of equity instruments (including shares or share options) of the entity or another group entity.”

The defining characteristic is that the settlement is always in cash, the employee never receives actual shares. Instead, the payment amount is indexed to the share price, giving employees economic exposure to share price movements without any transfer of equity.

This stands in contrast to Equity Settled Share-based Payments, where employees receive shares or options as compensation, and the company recognises an equity reserve rather than a liability on its balance sheet.

“Cash settled share-based payments create real liabilities remeasured every reporting date until settlement, making them fundamentally different from their equity settled counterparts.”

Common Types & Instruments

Several well-known instruments fall under the cash settled share-based payments umbrella. Understanding each is critical for accurate accounting:

Share Appreciation Rights (SARs)

SARs entitle employees to a cash payment equal to the increase in the company’s share price over a specified base price during the vesting period. They mirror the payoff of share options but always settle in cash. SARs are among the most common cash settled instruments and are explicitly referenced in IFRS 2’s implementation guidance.

Phantom Share Plans

Phantom shares are notional (fictional) shares allocated to employees. At settlement, the employee receives a cash payment equal to the value of those phantom shares at market price. They track share value in full not just appreciation, making them economical equivalents to holding actual shares without conferring ownership rights.

Cash-settled Restricted Share Units (RSUs)

Similar to standard RSUs but settled in cash at the market price on the vesting date rather than through the delivery of actual shares. These are common in jurisdictions where share delivery involves complex regulatory requirements.

Deferred Cash Bonus Plans Linked to Share Price

Some bonus arrangements defer payment and link the final payout to share price performance. Where the payment amount is determined by reference to the entity’s Equity Instruments, these plans fall within the scope of IFRS 2 as cash settled arrangements.

Scope Note IFRS 2 applies to all cash settled share-based payments regardless of whether the counterparty is an employee, a director, a consultant, or any other party providing goods or services.

IFRS 2 Recognition Criteria

IFRS 2, effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005, is the governing standard for all share-based payment transactions. For cash settled transactions specifically, paragraphs 30–33 set out the recognition and measurement requirements.

When to Recognise

An entity must recognise:

  • Services received as an expense in profit or loss (or as an asset where appropriate) as the employee renders service during the vesting period.
  • A corresponding liability on the balance sheet, measured at the fair value of the liability at each reporting date.

The Core Recognition Principle

The services received (and the liability) are recognised over the vesting period, the period during which all specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. This matches the expense recognition to the period in which the economic benefit (services) is received.

Key Principle Unlike equity settled awards where the grant-date fair value is locked in and never remeasured, the corresponding liabilities of cash settled share-based payments must be remeasured to fair value at every reporting date and at the date of settlement.

Expense Recognition Pattern

If vesting conditions are satisfied evenly over time (straight-line vesting), the expense is recognised on a straight-line basis. If vesting accelerates or is back-loaded, expense must reflect the pattern of service receipt.

Measurement at Fair Value

The measurement of cash settled share-based payments is one of the most technically challenging aspects of IFRS 2. The liability is measured at fair value at every reporting date, not at grant-date fair value as with equity settled awards.

What Does “Fair Value of the Liability” Mean?

For a SAR or phantom share plan, the fair value of the liability is the amount the entity would have to pay if it settled the award today. This is typically estimated using option pricing models (for awards with option-like features) or simply the current share price (for full-value awards like phantom shares).

Option Pricing Models

The most frequently used model for SARs is the Black-Scholes-Merton model, though binomial (lattice) models are also common for awards with complex features. Key inputs include:

  • Current share price at the measurement date
  • Exercise price (or base price of the SAR)
  • Expected volatility of the share price
  • Risk-free interest rate over the expected term
  • Expected dividends
  • Expected term (taking into account employee behaviour)
Remeasurement Volatility Because the liability is remeasured every period, income statement volatility is inherent in cash settled plans. A rising share price increases the liability and the expense; a falling price reduces both. This is a key difference compared to equity settled awards, which have no P&L impact after the grant date (except for forfeitures).

At Settlement Date

At the date the award is settled (i.e., cash is paid out), any difference between the carrying amount of the liability and the cash paid is recognised in profit or loss. In practice, if the liability has been correctly measured at fair value using the current share price, this difference should be minimal for full-value awards.

Vesting Conditions Explained

Vesting conditions determine when an employee becomes entitled to exercise or receive the award. IFRS 2 classifies conditions into two key categories, and how they are treated differs significantly:

Condition TypeExamplesTreatment
Service ConditionEmployee must remain employed for 3 yearsRecognised over the vesting period; forfeitures adjust the cumulative expense
Performance Condition — Non-marketEPS must grow by 10% over 3 yearsIncluded in the estimate of awards expected to vest; revised if performance expectations change
Performance Condition — MarketTSR must exceed a peer group indexFactored into the fair value measurement at grant date; not revised subsequently even if the condition is not met
Non-vesting ConditionEmployee must hold shares acquired on exerciseFactored into fair value; no revision if condition not met
Market vs Non-market Conditions For cash settled share-based payments, the treatment of market conditions is nuanced: while market conditions are reflected in each period’s fair value remeasurement (since the fair value calculation inherently includes share price movements), non-market performance conditions affect the number of awards expected to vest rather than the per-unit fair value.

Journal Entries & Accounting Treatment

The general accounting treatment for cash settled share-based payments follows a consistent pattern across each reporting period from grant date to settlement. Here is how the entries flow:

Each Reporting Date During Vesting

At each balance sheet date, the entity recognises a portion of the total expected cost, adjusted for the remeasured fair value of the liability:

Journal Entry — Each Reporting Period
Dr
Cr

The credit accumulates on the balance sheet as a current or non-current liability depending on the expected settlement date. The debit is recognised in profit or loss as employee compensation expense (or capitalised if the services relate to a qualifying asset).

On Remeasurement (Between Vesting and Settlement)

If the award has vested but not yet been exercised (where exercise is at the employee’s discretion), the liability continues to be remeasured. Changes in fair value go to profit or loss:

Journal Entry — Remeasurement Gain
Dr
Cr

On Settlement (Cash Payment)

Journal Entry — Settlement
Dr
Cr

Any difference between the carrying amount of the liability and cash paid is recognised in profit or loss at settlement.

Worked Example: Share Appreciation Rights

📋 Scenario Details

On 1 January 2024, Entity XYZ grants 1,000 SARs to a senior executive. The SARs vest after 3 years of continuous service (service condition only) and will be settled in cash based on the share price appreciation above the base price of $20 per share.

Assume the following fair values (determined using Black-Scholes):

DateShare PriceFair Value per SARAwards Expected to Vest
31 Dec 2024$24$6.401,000
31 Dec 2025$27$9.101,000
31 Dec 2026 (vesting)$30$10.001,000
Settlement (30 Jun 2027)$32$12.00 (intrinsic)

Expense Calculation

Cumulative Expense = FV per SAR × Awards Expected to Vest × (Years Elapsed / Total Vesting Years)
YearCumulative LiabilityPrior LiabilityExpense for Year
2024$6.40 × 1,000 × 1/3 = $2,133$0$2,133
2025$9.10 × 1,000 × 2/3 = $6,067$2,133$3,934
2026$10.00 × 1,000 × 3/3 = $10,000$6,067$3,933
2027 (to settlement)$12.00 × 1,000 = $12,000$10,000$2,000 (remeasurement)

Total expense recognised over the life of the award: $12,000 exactly the cash paid out at settlement. The remeasurement ensures the liability always equals the intrinsic value at each reporting date, eliminating any settlement difference.

Journal Entry — 31 December 2024
$2,133
$2,133
Journal Entry — Settlement (30 June 2027)
$12,000
$12,000

Cash vs Equity Settled: Key Differences

The distinction between cash settled share-based payments and equity settled share-based payments has profound implications for financial reporting. Understanding the differences is essential for anyone working in financial reporting, compensation design, or equity research.

FeatureCash SettledEquity Settled
Balance sheet impactLiability recognisedEquity reserve recognised
Measurement basisFair value remeasured at each reporting dateGrant-date fair value locked in
P&L volatilityHigh — driven by share price movementsLow — fixed expense spread over vesting period
DilutionNo dilution to existing shareholdersDilutive — increases shares outstanding
Cash flow impactOperating / financing cash outflow at settlementNo direct cash outflow (proceeds if exercised)
Tax deductibilityTypically deductible when cash is paidVaries significantly by jurisdiction
Employee perceptionClear, predictable cash valueValue depends on share price at exercise
Employer riskEmployer bears all share price riskEmployee bears share price risk post-grant
“The choice between cash settled share-based payments and equity SBP is not merely an accounting choice, it is a fundamental decision about who bears the share price risk and how liabilities appear on the balance sheet.”

Disclosure Requirements under IFRS 2

IFRS 2 paragraphs 44–52 require extensive disclosures for share-based payment arrangements. For cash settled share-based payments specifically, the following disclosures are mandatory:

Nature & Terms of Arrangements

  • Description of each type of cash settled arrangement (e.g., SARs, phantom shares)
  • Vesting conditions, contractual life, settlement terms
  • Number of instruments granted, exercised, forfeited, expired during the period

Fair Value Information

  • Weighted average Fair Value of the liability at period end
  • Valuation methodology used (e.g., Black-Scholes, binomial model)
  • Key model inputs: expected volatility, expected term, risk-free rate, expected dividends
  • How expected volatility was determined (historical vs implied)

Financial Statement Impact

  • Total expense for cash settled arrangements recognised in the period
  • Carrying amount of the liability at period end
  • Intrinsic value of vested liabilities (where the employee has an unconditional right to cash but settlement has not yet occurred)
Aggregation Entities with multiple different arrangements may aggregate disclosures only to the extent that aggregation does not obscure material information. Material differences in nature, vesting conditions, or settlement terms generally require separate disclosure.

Reconciliation of Outstanding Awards

IFRS 2 requires a reconciliation of the number of awards outstanding at the beginning and end of the period, showing grants, exercises, forfeitures, and expirations. For cash settled awards with exercise prices, the weighted average exercise price must also be disclosed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. Under IFRS 2, cash settled share-based payments are always recognised as liabilities because the entity has an obligation to transfer cash (or other assets). There is no option to reclassify a cash settled award as equity. This contrasts with awards where the entity has a choice of settlement method, which require more complex classification analysis.
Forfeitures reduce the number of awards expected to vest, which reduces the cumulative liability and cumulative expense. When an award is forfeited, the previously recognised liability (and corresponding expense) is reversed. This is done by adjusting the estimate of the number of instruments expected to vest, which is then used to recalculate the cumulative expense at the next reporting date.
When a cash settled award is modified to become equity settled, the entity derecognises the liability, recognises equity at the fair value of the equity instruments granted at the modification date, and any difference is recognised immediately in profit or loss. From the modification date forward, the arrangement is accounted for as an equity settled award under the equity settlement rules of IFRS 2.
Yes, phantom share plans typically have a nil exercise price because they pay out the full share value (not just the appreciation). The fair value of such an award is simply the current share price at each measurement date, making their valuation straightforward compared to SARs or options that require an option pricing model.
The tax effect is accounted for under IAS 12 Income Taxes. A deductible temporary difference arises when the carrying amount of the liability (based on IFRS 2 fair value) differs from the tax base (often nil until cash is paid). A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available to utilise the temporary difference. If the tax deduction is expected to exceed the cumulative accounting expense, the excess deferred tax benefit is recognised directly in equity.
Cash settled awards affect basic and diluted EPS only through their impact on profit or loss (via the compensation expense and remeasurement gains/losses). Unlike equity settled awards, they do not increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore do not dilute the denominator in the EPS calculation. This is one reason some companies prefer cash settled plans, they avoid share count dilution while still providing employees with share-price-linked compensation.